Topic: Voice,

Best Answer Explained in Below-:

The phrase "Panic seized the writer" communicates the idea that the writer is overwhelmed or taken over by a feeling of panic. Analyzing the options presented, both A and B convey a similar meaning but have subtle distinctions in usage.

Option A, "The writer was seized with panic," closely mirrors the original sentence's intention and structure. The use of "with" effectively demonstrates that panic is an emotion affecting the writer. In English, "seized with" is commonly used to express sudden or overpowering feelings, making it a fitting choice.

Option B, "The writer was seized by panic," is also acceptable; however, it often implies a more passive experience of panic, suggesting that it is an external force acting upon the writer. While this option is grammatically correct, it slightly shifts the emphasis away from the writer's active experience of panic.

Option C, "The writer was seized for panic," is incorrect as "for" does not appropriately contextualize the relationship between the writer and the emotion of panic. It suggests a purpose or reason, which does not align with the original intent.

Thus, Option A best captures the essence of the original statement while maintaining clarity in expression, making it the correct choice.